Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.
Identifieur interne : 002E90 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002E89; suivant : 002E91Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.
Auteurs : K. Randow [Suède] ; I. Ericsson ; K. Nilner ; A. Petersson ; P O GlantzSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1999.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Facteurs temps, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires (effets indésirables), Mandibule (), Mise en charge, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse dentaire partielle immédiate, Radiographie, Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique), Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie), Sujet âgé, Titane, Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Implants dentaires.
- imagerie diagnostique : Résorption alvéolaire.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- étiologie : Résorption alvéolaire.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Facteurs temps, Femelle, Humains, Mandibule, Mise en charge, Mâle, Ostéo-intégration, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse dentaire partielle immédiate, Radiographie, Sujet âgé, Titane, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants (adverse effects), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Partial, Immediate, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Radiography, Time Factors, Titanium, Weight-Bearing.
- MESH :
- chemical , adverse effects : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- etiology : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Mandible.
- Aged, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Partial, Immediate, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Radiography, Time Factors, Titanium, Weight-Bearing.
Abstract
A clinical and radiographical study was performed to compare the outcome of oral rehabilitation in the edentulous mandible by fixed supraconstructions connected to implants installed according to either i) a 1-stage surgical procedure and immediate loading (Experimental Group-EG), or ii) the original 2-stage concept (Reference Group-RG). The EG comprised 16 subjects with edentulous mandibles. Beyond the non-smoking criteria the following specific inclusion criteria were adopted: i) all patients had to consider themselves to be in good general health, ii) the amount of bone had to enable the installation of 5-6, at least 10 mm long fixtures to be bicortically anchored (Mk II fixtures; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) between the mental foramina, and iii) the patients had to be available for the follow-up and maintenance programme. A total of 88 implants were placed in the EG (16 patients) compared to 30 in the RG (11 patients). In the EG, fixed appliances were connected to the implants within 20 days following implant installation while the fixed appliances in the RG were connected about 4 months following fixture installation. At the time for delivery of the supraconstructions all 27 patients were radiographically examined, an examination that was repeated at the 18-month follow-up. The analysis of the radiographs from the EG disclosed that during the 18-month observation period the mean loss of bone support amounted to 0.4 mm. The corresponding value observed in the RG was 0.8 mm. During the 18-month observation period no fixture was lost in any of the 2 groups examined. The implants under study as well as those in the reference material were at all observation intervals found to be clinically stable. The present clinical study demonstrated that it is, at least based on an 18-month observation period, possible to successfully load titanium dental implants immediately following installation via a permanent fixed rigid cross-arch supraconstruction. However, such a treatment approach has so far to be strictly limited to the inter-foramina area of the edentulous mandible.
PubMed: 10196785
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:10196785Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.</title><author><name sortKey="Randow, K" sort="Randow, K" uniqKey="Randow K" first="K" last="Randow">K. Randow</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Malmö</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ericsson, I" sort="Ericsson, I" uniqKey="Ericsson I" first="I" last="Ericsson">I. Ericsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nilner, K" sort="Nilner, K" uniqKey="Nilner K" first="K" last="Nilner">K. Nilner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petersson, A" sort="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A" first="A" last="Petersson">A. Petersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glantz, P O" sort="Glantz, P O" uniqKey="Glantz P" first="P O" last="Glantz">P O Glantz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1999">1999</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10196785</idno><idno type="pmid">10196785</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003959</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003959</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003959</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003959</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003959</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003959</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.</title><author><name sortKey="Randow, K" sort="Randow, K" uniqKey="Randow K" first="K" last="Randow">K. Randow</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Malmö</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ericsson, I" sort="Ericsson, I" uniqKey="Ericsson I" first="I" last="Ericsson">I. Ericsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nilner, K" sort="Nilner, K" uniqKey="Nilner K" first="K" last="Nilner">K. Nilner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petersson, A" sort="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A" first="A" last="Petersson">A. Petersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glantz, P O" sort="Glantz, P O" uniqKey="Glantz P" first="P O" last="Glantz">P O Glantz</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="1999" type="published">1999</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Partial, Immediate</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires (effets indésirables)</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse dentaire partielle immédiate</term><term>Radiographie</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie)</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Titane</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Implants dentaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Partial, Immediate</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse dentaire partielle immédiate</term><term>Radiographie</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Titane</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A clinical and radiographical study was performed to compare the outcome of oral rehabilitation in the edentulous mandible by fixed supraconstructions connected to implants installed according to either i) a 1-stage surgical procedure and immediate loading (Experimental Group-EG), or ii) the original 2-stage concept (Reference Group-RG). The EG comprised 16 subjects with edentulous mandibles. Beyond the non-smoking criteria the following specific inclusion criteria were adopted: i) all patients had to consider themselves to be in good general health, ii) the amount of bone had to enable the installation of 5-6, at least 10 mm long fixtures to be bicortically anchored (Mk II fixtures; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) between the mental foramina, and iii) the patients had to be available for the follow-up and maintenance programme. A total of 88 implants were placed in the EG (16 patients) compared to 30 in the RG (11 patients). In the EG, fixed appliances were connected to the implants within 20 days following implant installation while the fixed appliances in the RG were connected about 4 months following fixture installation. At the time for delivery of the supraconstructions all 27 patients were radiographically examined, an examination that was repeated at the 18-month follow-up. The analysis of the radiographs from the EG disclosed that during the 18-month observation period the mean loss of bone support amounted to 0.4 mm. The corresponding value observed in the RG was 0.8 mm. During the 18-month observation period no fixture was lost in any of the 2 groups examined. The implants under study as well as those in the reference material were at all observation intervals found to be clinically stable. The present clinical study demonstrated that it is, at least based on an 18-month observation period, possible to successfully load titanium dental implants immediately following installation via a permanent fixed rigid cross-arch supraconstruction. However, such a treatment approach has so far to be strictly limited to the inter-foramina area of the edentulous mandible.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">10196785</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1999</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>10</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1999</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>8-15</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>A clinical and radiographical study was performed to compare the outcome of oral rehabilitation in the edentulous mandible by fixed supraconstructions connected to implants installed according to either i) a 1-stage surgical procedure and immediate loading (Experimental Group-EG), or ii) the original 2-stage concept (Reference Group-RG). The EG comprised 16 subjects with edentulous mandibles. Beyond the non-smoking criteria the following specific inclusion criteria were adopted: i) all patients had to consider themselves to be in good general health, ii) the amount of bone had to enable the installation of 5-6, at least 10 mm long fixtures to be bicortically anchored (Mk II fixtures; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) between the mental foramina, and iii) the patients had to be available for the follow-up and maintenance programme. A total of 88 implants were placed in the EG (16 patients) compared to 30 in the RG (11 patients). In the EG, fixed appliances were connected to the implants within 20 days following implant installation while the fixed appliances in the RG were connected about 4 months following fixture installation. At the time for delivery of the supraconstructions all 27 patients were radiographically examined, an examination that was repeated at the 18-month follow-up. The analysis of the radiographs from the EG disclosed that during the 18-month observation period the mean loss of bone support amounted to 0.4 mm. The corresponding value observed in the RG was 0.8 mm. During the 18-month observation period no fixture was lost in any of the 2 groups examined. The implants under study as well as those in the reference material were at all observation intervals found to be clinically stable. The present clinical study demonstrated that it is, at least based on an 18-month observation period, possible to successfully load titanium dental implants immediately following installation via a permanent fixed rigid cross-arch supraconstruction. However, such a treatment approach has so far to be strictly limited to the inter-foramina area of the edentulous mandible.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Randow</LastName><ForeName>K</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ericsson</LastName><ForeName>I</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nilner</LastName><ForeName>K</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Petersson</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Glantz</LastName><ForeName>P O</ForeName><Initials>PO</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003831" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Immediate</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016474" MajorTopicYN="N">Weight-Bearing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1999</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1999</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1999</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10196785</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Suède</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Ericsson, I" sort="Ericsson, I" uniqKey="Ericsson I" first="I" last="Ericsson">I. Ericsson</name><name sortKey="Glantz, P O" sort="Glantz, P O" uniqKey="Glantz P" first="P O" last="Glantz">P O Glantz</name><name sortKey="Nilner, K" sort="Nilner, K" uniqKey="Nilner K" first="K" last="Nilner">K. Nilner</name><name sortKey="Petersson, A" sort="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A" first="A" last="Petersson">A. Petersson</name></noCountry><country name="Suède"><noRegion><name sortKey="Randow, K" sort="Randow, K" uniqKey="Randow K" first="K" last="Randow">K. Randow</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E90 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002E90 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:10196785
|texte= Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:10196785" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |